Discussion
  • Read More
    TheRealMarthaJones3.0Anne Branigin
    5/08/19 9:24am

    I don’t know. I guess we’ll wait and see cause the language was not promising. The way it reads now is like they’re just saying, here is more money. When it needs to say, here is more money and here are the standards you have to meet in order to get that money, and here are the penalties should you fail to meet standards or fail to comply with regulation.

    Reply
    • Read More
      bfredTheRealMarthaJones3.0
      5/08/19 1:37pm

      What, measure outcomes to ensure efficient spending?  I guess there’s a first for everything.

      Reply
    • Read More
      Squib308TheRealMarthaJones3.0
      5/08/19 1:53pm

      Or in my own reformulation - any pregnant lady can get to a doctor who’ll say “Ok, you’re pregnant, we’ve got your back”. And not have it just feel like empty words. And not just have it FEEL like they’ve got your back, they actually do.

      It’s a crazy incredible thought to think that humans have been giving birth all the way back when we were first humans; we know more about medicine than we ever have in history. Yet here we are in the “first world” with these levels of infant and mother mortalities. And we (overall) pay more than any similar country for our health care! 

      Reply
  • Read More
    Pedantic PontificatorAnne Branigin
    5/08/19 3:07pm

    Let’s see the “pro-lifers” come out against this bill and show their true colors.

    I’m looking right at you, Bitch McConnell.

    Reply
    • Read More
      JonsLegionPedantic Pontificator
      5/08/19 3:42pm

      That POS will kill this in committee and it will never see the floor of the Senate.

      Reply
  • Read More
    JonsLegionAnne Branigin
    5/08/19 3:40pm

    Waiting for those Right to Life fuckstains to get all up and behind this movement. Strangely, someone drove them out with a bunch of crickets?

    Or is that a plague of Locusts cast upon the blasphemers?

    Reply