Discussion
  • Read More
    Value SubtractedDanette Chavez
    12/08/17 10:47am

    I couldn’t be less interested in an R-rated Star Trek movie.

    Reply
    • Read More
      jamboxdotcomValue Subtracted
      12/08/17 10:52am

      I agree. However, after what Sir Patrick said in this article, I might be slightly interested if they got him on board.

      Reply
    • Read More
      Pope FrancisValue Subtracted
      12/08/17 10:52am

      What if they Rasta-fy it by 10%?

      Reply
  • Read More
    TheClassicDanette Chavez
    12/08/17 10:44am

    I will give a kidney to any executive who can make that happen, Stewart still has some Picard juice left in him.

    It won’t be my Kidney but still beggars can’t be choosey.

    Reply
    • Read More
      Puke EllingtonTheClassic
      12/08/17 2:37pm

      Beggars CAN supply kidneys

      Reply
  • Read More
    ElijahTheProfitDanette Chavez
    12/08/17 10:50am

    I’ve got to stop reading these updates: the idea of a Tarantino directed Star Trek starring Patrick Stewart is getting me excited to the point where I know I’m going to go into a mild depression when it falls apart.

    Reply
  • Read More
    Sleep AttackDanette Chavez
    12/08/17 10:43am

    My first thought upon considering Patrick Stewart + Quentin Tarantino was Ben Kingsley’s amazing turn in Sexy Beast. And that got me super excited. But that’s not what we’re talking about here. We’re talking about Star Trek. Which, I dunno, does not get me super excited.

    Reply
    • Read More
      Dealylama2Sleep Attack
      12/08/17 10:53am

      I mean, I’m not 100% getting what comparison you’re making but I’m always stoked when someone brings up Sexy Beast.

      Reply
    • Read More
      Sleep AttackDealylama2
      12/08/17 10:58am

      I wasn’t very clear here, but what I meant to convey was how awesome I think it would be for Patrick Stewart to play against type as a monumentally evil badass of some kind in a Quentin Tarantino movie, like Ben Kingsley (who is also another older, bald English dude) did in Sexy Beast. But that’s not what we’d be getting here in this hypothetical thing, unless QT’s take on Picard is very, very different from my understanding of the canonical makeup of that character.

      Reply
  • Read More
    DJ BurnDanette Chavez
    12/08/17 11:32am

    Tea. Earl Gray. Motherfucker.

    Reply
    • Read More
      TheClassicDJ Burn
      12/08/17 2:54pm

      Klingonese, motherfucker, do you speak it?

      Reply
  • Read More
    Yep This is Definitely Hell - I miss SplinterDanette Chavez
    12/08/17 10:47am

    After what Abrams did with Star Trek, I don’t give a fuck anymore. Bring it, Tarantino!

    Reply
    • Read More
      700v14Yep This is Definitely Hell - I miss Splinter
      12/09/17 1:10pm

      Your mistake was maybe giving a fuck about Star Trek in the first place; many people list Galaxy Quest as one of their favorite ST movies, kind of speaks to the quality of ST movies overall

      Reply
  • Read More
    grant8418Danette Chavez
    12/08/17 11:09am

    Please let this happen. I couldn’t care less how this makes absolutely no sense. It’s so “WTF” that I’m highly interested.

    Reply
  • Read More
    FastFreddy666Danette Chavez
    12/08/17 11:07am

    Make it so, number one motherfucker.

    I’m totally down with this.

    Reply
  • Read More
    VelocirapstarDanette Chavez
    12/08/17 10:36am

    It’s a Tarantino movie. I’d rather see him play ‘Avery Bullock in Space.’

    Reply
  • Read More
    hammerbuttDanette Chavez
    12/08/17 4:24pm

    Depends would there still be a scene of the Enterprise flying by with Sabotage blasting in the background?

    Reply