Discussion
  • Read More
    Al b sureJE Reich
    6/12/16 7:57pm

    Because prop guns are the issue. Not radical Islam or the fact that a man who was being watched by the FBI was able to get guns. Moral victory I guess

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      BrynMartianAl b sure
      6/12/16 8:01pm

      Life is complex. More than one issue can apply.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      tom dunneAl b sure
      6/12/16 8:09pm

      Good news! The parts of Alexander Hamilton’s life that involved radical Islam and FBI surveillance have been cut from the play as well.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Nitelight62JE Reich
    6/12/16 8:09pm

    You know, if the Founding Fathers had thought out the consequences of the Second Amendment, then Alexander Hamilton might still be alive today.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Nicole WattersonNitelight62
      6/12/16 8:11pm

      The Founding Fathers were too busy dealing with their slaves to bother with something so trivial.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      CaptOtterNitelight62
      6/12/16 9:15pm

      In the founding fathers’ time, an armed citizenry actually served as a check on tyranny—but in the age of multi-million dollar force multiplier (i.e., smart bombs; tanks; attack helicopters; etc.), not so much.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Rapunzel's Frying PanJE Reich
    6/12/16 7:51pm

    Aaaaaaand now I’m crying again. But on the bright side: Lin-Manuel Miranda. He is the bright side.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      QueenofSassyfrassRapunzel's Frying Pan
      6/12/16 9:30pm

      That sonnet?!? Oh my goodness, all the rain on my face.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      Rapunzel's Frying PanQueenofSassyfrass
      6/13/16 3:07am

      but seriously like WHO WRITES A SONNET other than the human embodiment of perfection

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    RumberaJE Reich
    6/12/16 8:10pm

    Glad that they did this, out of respect to the victim’s families... and to all victims of violence everywhere. I’m finding myself wondering if we need to take a seriously hard look at our conflation of violence as entertainment. Yes, I know that it’s an old argument and I know all of the rebuttals. But something can’t be right with the belief that violence and murder is entertaining. Or maybe I’m just super sensitive today.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Nach0Rumbera
      6/12/16 8:23pm

      This was a terrorist attack. It had nothing to do with entertainment.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      fobabettRumbera
      6/12/16 8:54pm

      But there’s absolutely no evidence that this guy was influenced by violent media. There is an abundance of evidence that he was tied to Islamic extremism, and had favorable views of ISIS and the Boston Marathon bombers. There may be something to be said for looking at how violent entertainment leads to violence in the real world, but that isn’t what happened in this case.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    AmeliaEJE Reich
    6/12/16 8:25pm

    Thoughtful, compassionate response from the Hamilton cast and the Tonys.

    And a reminder of gun technology in the Founders’ era. The Second Amendment enshrined a (free white male) person’s right to keep and bear a musket for militia use. Even in their wildest imaginations/nightmares, they did not foresee or intend AR-15 human slaughter tools in private hands.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      BerndAmeliaE
      6/12/16 9:12pm

      Even those of us who use muskets in our more or less daily lives (historic site folks) we are VERY aware of gun issues and gun safety. No flagging, all weapons are treated as loaded, even a fake gun or dummy, steel guards. Powder is drenched or removed or separated. A situation can go from safe to unsafe in seconds.

      These are weapons of death, whether in war or peace or food. They are pieces of survival, of art, of skill. And they are not to be considered trivial or incapable of horrible things. We are so far removed from this and I am reminded of it every time I fire, take care of, or handle a musket. Mostly because of the complete and utter dumbass comments someone makes about them.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      FaustianSlipBernd
      6/12/16 11:03pm

      Well said. I own a reproduction musket for living history stuff, and even black powder blanks will mess you up if you don’t take appropriate safety measures. A gun is never “just” a gun or “just” unloaded or “just” loaded with a blank round. A guy got shot in the face with a live round at the 135th Gettysburg reenactment because someone in another unit was using a borrowed pistol that had never been checked by anyone in the unit before it was loaned out, and it had last been used for live firing. All it takes is one mistake, not even by the person handling the firearm, and someone can be injured or worse.

      Personally, I think one of the best things about older, single-shot muskets and rifles is that the fact that they take time to load forces the shooter to stop and think before pulling the trigger. That required pause is wholly absent from modern weapons, when you can just squeeze that trigger and watch the rounds fly until you jam or run out of ammo.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    swaggyjaygarrickJE Reich
    6/12/16 8:37pm

    Are y’all not capable of ungraying people? This proliferation of trolls in the last 24 hours is astounding

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Angelica SchuylerJE Reich
      6/12/16 8:11pm

      Just listened to “Dear Theodosia” and my head filled with images of that mother from the news who was looking for her son.

      Dear God, what an awful, awful day.

      Reply
      <
      • Read More
        Mike Pipper Super GIF EnthusiastJE Reich
        6/13/16 6:18am

        Still relevant:

        AND it looks like we now have the record at 50+ dead.

        USA! USA! USA!

        Reply
        <
        • Read More
          BlondeGoddessJE Reich
          6/12/16 8:32pm

          And then there are people who are outraged by this:

          “They shouldn’t remove the muskets.

          The Framers were thinking muskets when they wrote the 2nd Amendment not assault rifles.

          This should be made very clear tonight if at all possible.”

          #priorities.

          Reply
          <
          • Read More
            Nach0JE Reich
            6/12/16 8:15pm

            Will they replace them with walkie-talkies?

            Reply
            <