Discussion
  • Read More
    panhandlinpaulBrendan O'Connor
    4/15/16 12:36pm

    She’s so right. It’s important parents tell their children the truth about this and how people are intentionally twisting the science for their financial benefit. And just like Sarah said, it is totally a fundraising tool for craven politicians who don’t give a fuck about the future and just what their special interest cronies want.

    Sarah Palin has never been so right.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Tommy Coloradopanhandlinpaul
      4/15/16 12:42pm

      Why are you out of the grey? Is this satire or are you really just that ignorant?

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      panhandlinpaulTommy Colorado
      4/15/16 12:50pm

      I’m dead serious and sad that I have to explain it to you. Maybe that’s why you’re still in the grey?

      The controversy over climate change is being driven by those with an agenda. For example, the oil industry.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Cam/ronBrendan O'Connor
    4/15/16 12:17pm
    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Thaag TidestalkerCam/ron
      4/15/16 12:21pm

      Oh it is ON like RED DAWN.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      BobbySeriousThaag Tidestalker
      4/15/16 12:28pm

      or...

      GIF
      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    rewodBrendan O'Connor
    4/15/16 12:17pm

    Any 8 year old with a baking soda volcano is more of a scientist than Ms. Palin.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Mount_Prionrewod
      4/15/16 12:23pm

      Paper mache is hard science. Once it dries.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      GlitterbombFartsrewod
      4/15/16 12:27pm

      Maybe she’s born with it...
      Maybe it’s Crazy-lline.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    The Once and Future KingBrendan O'Connor
    4/15/16 12:22pm

    She’s expressing her thoughts via complete sentences made of words that make sense when used together. So that’s an improvement.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Manic OttiThe Once and Future King
      4/15/16 12:24pm

      “sense”

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      KatmanduThe Once and Future King
      4/15/16 12:29pm

      Trust me, it’s a fluke. She must’ve said it early in the day before she’d had a chance to have her morning “OJ”. If you know what I mean. Wink, wink.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    KatmanduBrendan O'Connor
    4/15/16 12:22pm

    I get stupider every time I listen to Sarah Palin. I can feel my brain cells dying in protest.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      butcherbakertoiletrymakerKatmandu
      4/15/16 12:34pm

      Dave...my mind is going...I can feel it...I can feel it...

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      Dave butcherbakertoiletrymaker
      4/15/16 12:37pm

      Daisy. Daisy. How I love you dear...

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    God isn't real. Grow up.Brendan O'Connor
    4/15/16 12:18pm

    If I see one more person confuse weather with climate, I will BLOW MY FUCKING BRAINS OUT.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      rewodGod isn't real. Grow up.
      4/15/16 12:20pm

      I’d beseech you not to, but that bullshit happens so often, you’re probably already dead.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      steinoGod isn't real. Grow up.
      4/15/16 12:31pm

      Denier logic: “If global warming is real, why do we still have winter, huh? Shouldn’t the globe be warm all year round?”

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    bern10Brendan O'Connor
    4/15/16 12:20pm

    Yo, seriously: FUCK anyone who is a global warming denier. You’re probably over the age of 50 and going to be dead before my kids have to deal with the harsh realities of how badly “The Greatest Generation” screwed up this planet.

    Global warming is one of the biggest reasons why I’d love to abolish the electoral college. Because maybe if we didn’t leave every election in the hands of shit kickers from Western Pennsylvania and Ohio, some of us “coastal elites” whose property will be underwater in 60 years might get our issues taken seriously.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Y0UT00-ahh-Fuck-Itbern10
      4/15/16 12:28pm

      “...probably over the age of 50 and going to be dead before my kids have to deal with the harsh realities...” “...shit kickers from Western Pennsylvania and Ohio...”

      Actually, you’d be surprised how many young people there are in more progressive areas/states who don’t give a shit, don’t recycle and don’t care just because they’re “not ever having kids”.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      Katmandubern10
      4/15/16 12:32pm

      Let’s see, you managed to hit both ageist and classist there. Keep up the good work. Maybe next time you’ll hit the trifecta.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Sons of Sam MaloneBrendan O'Connor
    4/15/16 12:25pm

    I’m still waiting for John McCain to go around and personally apologize to every American (and the English language) for unleashing her on American politics.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      RobNYCSons of Sam Malone
      4/15/16 12:41pm

      Never going to happen. And if he gets a primary opponent again in Arizona he’ll go crawling back to her for an endorsement like he did in when he was last up for reelection.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      Sluicer's ghostSons of Sam Malone
      4/15/16 1:10pm

      You are soooo underselling McCain's incompetence and stupidity.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Quantum SuicideBrendan O'Connor
    4/15/16 12:22pm

    She’s not the scientist Bill Nye is, but she’s definitely proving herself to be as much a comedian as Tina Fey is. Sarah Palin is a joke.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      GoodNaturedCadQuantum Suicide
      4/15/16 12:41pm

      A comedian makes jokes. Sarah Palin is a joke.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      Quantum SuicideGoodNaturedCad
      4/15/16 12:49pm

      If she’s not a comedian, then why is it everything she says is so laughable? Hmm? Hmmmmm?

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    lewis55number2Brendan O'Connor
    4/15/16 12:28pm

    Has she ever spoken in a complete, grammatically correct, non-run-on sentence? This is a serious question.

    I know humans typically don’t speak with perfect grammar or in perfectly complete sentences. But as someone who has worked as a (local) journalist, I also know that most people speak in language that approximates grammatically correct complete sentences closely enough that it is not very hard to quote them as speaking in complete sentences just by adding a bit of punctuation to their quotes. (Slightly tweaking quotes to make them into readable sentences is standard practice in most journalism. NYT does it with every quote you see in the paper every day.)

    But with Palin, you can’t do that. Its such a word salad — such a profound verbal onslaught of non-sequiturs within sentences — that I wouldn’t even know where to begin.

    Like just look at this!?:

    “It is being used as a fundraiser, it is being used as a partisan issue unfortunately so that parents can be first and foremost in their child’s life and influence them to trust science and believe in science and not leave it to the teachers.”

    She seamlessly changes to a separate thought in the middle of a clause! That’s actually hard to do for most people.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      cepalglewis55number2
      4/15/16 1:12pm

      As an academic effort, let me see if I can do it.

      “It is being used as a fundraiser. It is being used as a partisan issue, unfortunately.”

      LINE BREAK ACCIDENTALLY ATE AN INEXPLICABLE “SO THAT” HERE

      “Parents can be first and foremost in their child’s life and influence them to trust science, and believe in science, and not leave it to the teachers.”

      It can be done, but you gotta excise that conjunction.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      Muscatocepalg
      4/15/16 1:28pm

      LINE BREAK ACCIDENTALLY ATE AN INEXPLICABLE “SO THAT” HERE

      “Parents can be first and foremost in their child’s life and influence them to trust science, and believe in science, and not leave it to the teachers.”

      It can be done, but you gotta excise that conjunction.

      But it still seems vaguely nonsensical, in that I genuinely don’t know whether or not it’s supposed to be a good - or a bad, or a whatever -thing for parents to want children to trust science rather than teachers. It seems mostly to me just a string of words she’s somehow heard in a vaguely related context before, regurgitated. I just want to shake her sometimes and scream “what do you mean???”

      Reply
      <