Discussion
  • Read More
    accesscodeSam Biddle
    3/14/16 5:54pm

    okay. I’m waiting for ... what’s wrong. Is there a scandal? What is it?

    Oh! Nothing. I do like the nice sexist photo of “crazy eyes.” Good job, Sam!

    Thank goodness Bernie is NOTHING like his supporters. I would never vote for him if he were.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      You might be wrong.accesscode
      3/14/16 6:22pm

      What is sexist about the photo?

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      accesscodeYou might be wrong.
      3/14/16 6:26pm

      The “crazy eyes” photo is a sexist trope. It’s used to discredit women, you know, those nutty emotional nutjobs in their irrational nuttiness. Clinton is pictured with a lot of them. But, you don’t really see crazy eyes on any man except Manson.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Fabian KnockwurstSam Biddle
    3/14/16 5:14pm

    egads, Mr Biddle, contemplating your last several dozen postings one might commence to have the notion that you weren’t exactly a neutral reporter for the fourth estate. If, however unlikely that may be, were it to be true, for the honesty of your noble profession you ought to replace your by-line with: Sam “avid supporter of <insert politicians name>“ Biddle

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      maybedontshakehandswithZipporahFabian Knockwurst
      3/14/16 5:37pm

      Haha, and you think Jon Chait and Paul Krugman, to use two examples, aren’t using their columns to stump for Hilary? That any media still tries to hide behind the mask of “objectivity” is stupid, and only matched by the stupidity of people that believe it.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      Detective RexFabian Knockwurst
      3/14/16 5:40pm

      You’re an idiot.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    RappingNinjaSam Biddle
    3/14/16 5:06pm

    Biddle hate-on for anything related to Hillary Clinton is raging so hard I can see it from space.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      GregoireRappingNinja
      3/14/16 5:08pm

      It’s visceral. It’s tangible. It’s delicious.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      puncha yo bunsRappingNinja
      3/14/16 5:09pm

      That’s hot.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Cam/ronSam Biddle
    3/14/16 5:10pm

    Kissinger: “Zzz...what, what? Ah that’s right, I’m on the board of this company.”

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Sid and FinancyCam/ron
      3/14/16 5:27pm

      “Zorry. I vell azleepkt for a zecond . . .”

      “The motion to double executive stock compensation is seconded! All those in favor?”

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      The Alvin Greene DreamCam/ron
      3/14/16 5:28pm

      God. Kissinger is actually on the board of directors for this shitpile. I thought you were joking.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    CannotDealAnymoreSam Biddle
    3/14/16 5:24pm

    Uggghhhhh, I’m positive some shady people have donated to every candidate.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      You might be wrong.CannotDealAnymore
      3/14/16 6:23pm

      Donated, sure. But run parties for them? Parties where the family of the candidate will talk to you if you hand over enough money?

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      BoSephusYou might be wrong.
      3/14/16 6:30pm

      Yes, since the dawn of elections

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    I Like Big Cheese And I Cannot LieSam Biddle
    3/14/16 5:00pm
    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Deadly the EternalI Like Big Cheese And I Cannot Lie
      3/14/16 9:56pm
      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    GrammaRayBurstSam Biddle
    3/14/16 5:06pm

    I’m starting to think that maybe possibly Gawker isn’t a fan of Hillary?

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      maybedontshakehandswithZipporahGrammaRayBurst
      3/14/16 5:40pm

      It’s a nice balance to the rest of the media, like the Times with Krugman, Blow, and Friedman, or NYMAG and the shill Chait, which is just as eager for Clinton.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      GrammaRayBurstmaybedontshakehandswithZipporah
      3/14/16 5:58pm

      I thought the Times was notoriously brutal on the Clintons, because they were “those people” and not worthy of the White House. It’s a weird dynamic.

      Also, I like that Gawker isn’t doing any “neutral” bullshit, but homerism is boring.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Denver is too damn highSam Biddle
    3/14/16 5:32pm

    I don’t get a good feeling about Hilary. Not TRUMP bad. Just soething way off. Certainly won’t be voting fort eh other team but I’m not sure I like what’s on the table

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      HarvestMoonDenver is too damn high
      3/14/16 5:43pm

      I wonder why...

      Could it be that you read Gawker and they have tried their hardest to convince you that she kills puppies?

      Fox News and the GOP have started sending Gawker Media fruit baskets and strippers for ruining her chances in she's the DEM nominee.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      flamingolingoHarvestMoon
      3/14/16 5:56pm

      Fortunately, Gawker is not particularly influential. It has a relatively small audience and isn’t really taken seriously as a political blog. It’s kind of funny watching the various bloggers flail about trying to attack Clinton in these really lame ways. It’s like they’ve lost all heart.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Rom RombertsSam Biddle
    3/14/16 5:22pm

    My new startup is a dog wearing roller skates inside an empty 30,000 square foot warehouse. I’ve secured $20 billion in funding and Hillary Clinton has promised to personally hand me a lemon once per month.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Johnny ChundersRom Romberts
      3/14/16 5:41pm

      Is there any space available for branding on the roller skates?

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Richard M TysonSam Biddle
    3/14/16 5:01pm

    Yeah but nobody who donates to her as any influence with her. Jeez.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      UnderDrivenRichard M Tyson
      3/14/16 5:37pm

      It’s probably true that a mere $1000 doesn’t buy any influence...

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      Doofenschmirtz, Inc.UnderDriven
      3/14/16 5:51pm

      Sure it does. It prevents Chelsea (and/or her secret service protection guys) from throwing spit balls at you when you’re not looking.

      Reply
      <