Discussion
  • Read More
    Johnny ChundersMax Read
    5/08/14 4:25pm

    Gawker needs a good science writer. You should hire somebody to do that.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      BĂşho se PierdeJohnny Chunders
      5/08/14 4:29pm

      Yes, please.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ : Riot GRRR is RUNNING WILDJohnny Chunders
      5/08/14 4:32pm

      Pay me in beakers, and I'll do it.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    lobstrMax Read
    5/08/14 4:17pm

    For funzies, can we have a peek at the specifics behind the "significant bonus for page views" — perhaps an example of x number of page views pays $y in le bonus?

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Max Readlobstr
      5/08/14 4:21pm

      From Joel's post:

      Recruits will operate on a $5 eCPM—earning $5 for every 1,000 uniques they bring in each month. We will "spot" Recruits their first $1,500 a month; we're not monsters. Recruits can post as little or as often as they'd like; determining the sweet spot will be part of their learning and tuning process. Monthly uniques over the first 300,000 ($1,500) a month will be paid out at the $5 eCPM, up to a maximum of $6,000. (An atypically aggressive bonus for Gawker, reached at just 1,250,000 uniques per month, but we want to reward initiative.)

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      nothiplobstr
      5/08/14 4:30pm

      You don't actually need to know how to write, just know how to reel people in with a clickbait title, and/or outrageous claim.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    a most evil queenMax Read
    5/08/14 4:17pm

    I am into this. I'm an attorney and I live in Chicago, one of the most politically back-assward cities in America. I would love to contribute a column debunking peoples' perceptions of what the law is versus what it ACTUALLY says.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      GregorMendela most evil queen
      5/08/14 4:34pm

      Tornado warning. Bye.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      a most evil queenGregorMendel
      5/08/14 4:38pm

      ...that's ominous.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Collapsed ConversationMax Read
    5/08/14 4:16pm

    Dear Max:

    How about on a freelance basis? That is, could I get compensated for any article posted onto my Kinja account that is ultimately made into a Gawker post? Please message my account at CollapsedConversation to discuss further. Thanks for your consideration.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Max ReadCollapsed Conversation
      5/08/14 4:23pm

      We don't have a mechanism in place to do this now, but the company is trying to figure out a way to compensate writers for successful posts written on their personal Kinja blogs.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      youareaninconpoopMax Read
      5/08/14 4:28pm

      Of course you don't... Classic Gawker BS. Screwing the little guy.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    toothpetardMax Read
    5/08/14 4:07pm

    Crap if I only had some clips.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      That Guy he's kinda gaytoothpetard
      5/08/14 4:15pm

      I am the absolute best at hyperbole. You will not find a single Kinja member who can tell you more about how damn amazing I am at hyperbole.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      Yukon Kizmiaztoothpetard
      5/08/14 4:18pm

      I think you meant magazines.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    Taylor BermanMax Read
    5/08/14 4:18pm

    One important thing Max left out: If you apply to work at Gawker, please say "Taylor Berman referred me for this job" in your cover letter/email.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Fleur-de-litTaylor Berman
      5/08/14 4:49pm
      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    BlerppMax Read
    5/08/14 4:15pm

    a young, hungry writer looking to carve out a beat for herself

    So ... are you specifically looking for a chick?

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Max ReadBlerpp
      5/08/14 4:25pm

      We're specifically looking for people who aren't hung up on that phrasing.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      youareaninconpoopMax Read
      5/08/14 4:28pm

      Sexist pig at Gawker at it again. Sickening really.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    ClioMax Read
    5/08/14 5:00pm

    What do clips and an application look like for a writer who's taking the "inexperience required" requirement to heart? I'm a writer of fiction, but I've lived on Gawker since 2006 and would love to be a part of it in a more substantive way. I have this special H/T to my name, and I sent this lively LTE to The Stranger's Slog blog a couple years ago, but beyond that my writing is trapped up in manuscripts. Any tips for what an application would look like?

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Max ReadClio
      5/08/14 5:28pm

      Start a Kinja and write posts of the kind you think could (or should) appear on Gawker. When you've got a handful, send me the link.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      slipdiscoMax Read
      5/08/14 5:36pm

      I could do the internet analysis portion, although I am better at discovering music.

      You can click on my avi for the blog.

      ETA: sorry, forgot to say I am nowhere near the new world. Tropical denizen here.

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    FindSeekMax Read
    5/08/14 5:02pm

    "We're looking for fast writers who can turn around original, engaging stories on a variety of topics; follow and advance breaking news; identify and cover emerging trends; and otherwise initiate, develop, and generally own ideas, stories, and conversations on the internet. You know, bloggers."

    You know, everywhere except BizarroGawkerWorld, those people are still called reporters. No matter what the platform, I can guarantee you that your applicants who are worth a damn don't want to be considered bloggers/aggregators. They want to be reporters. Unfortunately, fewer opportunities exist for them now, so they wind up having to listen to this weak rhetoric from an "editor" trying to lowball them. (If there are no reporters, why do editors need to exist at Gawker? Surely there must be a more modern term, yes?)

    How sad. No wonder the staff turnover at the Gawker sites has reached overload in the past several months.

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Joel JohnsonFindSeek
      5/08/14 5:52pm

      People who consider themselves too good to be called bloggers would never be happy here anyway.

      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      FindSeekJoel Johnson
      5/08/14 6:06pm

      You're quite wrong about that, but whatever. It's called "doing what one has to do to get a job - any job - in a desirable field and location in the current environment."

      Reply
      <
  • Read More
    DennyCraneMax Read
    5/08/14 5:16pm

    Hey Max, can you clear up some thing about the recruit program:

    1) the Recruits post you linked to says you're not taking unsolicited pitches, but this post here says you are. What is the case?

    2) if a recruit blog is successful, will the blogger be offered a chance at full-time employment?

    3) is bribery acceptable? And if so, who do I send my famous from-scratch chocolate brownies to?

    Reply
    <
    • Read More
      Max ReadDennyCrane
      5/08/14 5:24pm
      1. I believe this counts as a solicitation for pitches, so it should be fine.
      2. There's no one outcome to the recruit process—certainly for a particularly successful blogger full-time employment would be one possibility. We could also extend a contract, or determine new rates. Gawker tends to be pretty flexible, institutionally, as you may have seen.
      3. No.
      Reply
      <
    • Read More
      Joel JohnsonDennyCrane
      5/08/14 5:49pm

      I don't care if you bug Max, as long as you leave me alone.

      Reply
      <